<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Dark Visitor &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PRC Gov Responses to Hacking Allegations &#8211; Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All dates represent the date the article was published, not necesarily the date that the quote was made. July 26, 2004 In response to accusations that the Chinese government was involved in computer intrusions against ROK government agencies &#8220;Some media reports that the Chinese government might be behind the hacking incident are groundless&#8221; &#8211; Chinese [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All dates represent the date the article was published, not necesarily the date that the quote was made.</p>
<p><strong>July 26, 2004</strong><br />
In response to accusations that the Chinese government was involved in computer intrusions against ROK government agencies<br />
<em>&#8220;Some media reports that the Chinese government might be behind the hacking incident are groundless&#8221;</em> &#8211; Chinese Embassy in Seoul (no personal attribution)</p>
<p><strong>December 15, 2005</strong><br />
Response to SANS comments about China being involved in world wide hacking<br />
<em>&#8220;Work units and individuals are not permitted to use the Internet to be engaged in illegal activities or commit crimes,&#8230; China has laws that make tampering with or cracking a computer&#8217;s code illegal.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Qin Gang<br />
<strong></p>
<p>August 27, 2007</strong><br />
In response to a Der Spiegel article that reported intrusions into the German governemnt<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government attaches great importance to the hacker attack on the German government networks,&#8221;</em> adding China would take <em>&#8220;determined&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;forceful&#8221;</em> measures to combat hacker activities.  &#8211; Wen Jiabao</p>
<p><strong>August 28, 2007</strong><br />
In response to the reports of Chinese attributed intrusions into the government of Germany<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government has always opposed and prohibited any criminal activity that breaks down computer networks, including hacker attacks,&#8230; China has clear rules and regulations on this.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>September 4, 2007</strong><br />
In a public response to the FT article that suggested PRC government involvement in a Pentagon intrusion<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government has always opposed any Internet-wrecking crime, including hacking, and cracked down on it according to the law&#8221;</em> &#8211; An Lu (editor)</p>
<p><strong>September 10, 2007</strong><br />
Response to reports about intrusions into the French government for which the French plainly stated that they have no evidence to indicate PRC gov involvement.<br />
<em>&#8220;Saying that the Chinese military has made cyber-attacks on the networks of foreign governments is groundless and irresponsible and are a result of ulterior motives&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>April 9, 2008</strong><br />
In response to Business Week&#8217;s e-Spionage article<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese Government always opposes and forbids any cyber crimes including &#8220;hacking&#8221; that undermine the security of computer networks. Chinese laws and regulations are explicit in this regard.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Wang Baodong</p>
<p><strong>April 1, 2009</strong><br />
In response to Ghostnet report<br />
<em>&#8220;There is a ghost called the Cold War and a virus called the Theory of China&#8217;s Threat overseas,&#8230; Some people, possessed by this ghost and infected with this virus, &#8216;fall ill&#8217; from time to time. Their attempts at using rumors to disgrace China will never succeed&#8230;  It is the ghost and the virus that should be ferreted out&#8221; </em>- Qin Gang</p>
<p><strong>May 15, 2009</strong><br />
Response to accusations of Chinese espionage in PACOM.<br />
<em>&#8220;We urge the United States to abandon Cold War mentality, stop its groundless accusations against China and do more to help build mutual trust between the United States and China and the friendship between the two peoples,&#8221; &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu<br />
&#8220;The intrusion doesn&#8217;t exist at all&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>Jun 12, 2008</strong><br />
In response to reports of Chinese hacking into computers in the offices of Rep. Frank Wolf and Rep. Chris Smith.<br />
<em>&#8220;Is there any evidence? &#8230; Do we have such advanced technology? Even I don&#8217;t believe it,&#8230; I&#8217;d like to urge some people in the U.S. not to be paranoid,&#8230; They should do more to contribute to mutual understanding, trust and friendship between the U.S. and China.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Qin Gang</p>
<p><strong>January 19, 2010</strong><br />
In response to Indian allegations of Chinese hacking (following the Google intrusion)<br />
&#8220;I can say that these accusations are groundless&#8230; The Chinese government is firmly against hacking activities and will deal with relevant cases in accordance with the law&#8221; &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu</p>
<p><strong>January 22, 2010</strong><br />
In response to US Sec of State Hillary Clinton&#8217;s remarks about Internet Freedom and the Google intrusion<br />
<em>&#8220;We urge the United States to respect the facts and cease using so-called Internet freedom to make groundless accusations against China&#8221;</em> &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu<br />
<em>&#8220;China resolutely opposes Clinton&#8217;s remarks and it is not true that the country restricts online freedom&#8230;&#8221;</em> &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/world/asia/26google.html?partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">January 25, 2010</a></strong><br />
In response to US Sec of State Clinton&#8217;s request for a transparent investigation into the Google intrusion<br />
<em>“We are resolutely against those who make a issue of things without referring to actual facts by needlessly accusing China, ignoring Chinese laws and interfering in Chinese internal politics&#8221;</em> &#8211; unnamed spokesperson for the State Council Information Office</p>
<p><em>“As the global landscape is undergoing profound irreversible shifts, the calculated free-Internet scheme is just one step of a U.S. tactic to preserve its hegemonic domination”</em> &#8211; Yan Xuetong </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100125/wl_asia_afp/chinausitinternetgoogle6thleadwrap">January 25, 2010</a></strong><br />
Response to Google intrusion<br />
<em>The &#8220;accusation that the Chinese government participated in (any) cyberattack, either in an explicit or inexplicit way, is groundless and aims to denigrate China&#8230; We are firmly opposed to that&#8221; &#8211; unnamed spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to Xinhua </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darfur needs help, not malware&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2008/03/darfur-needs-help-not-malware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2008/03/darfur-needs-help-not-malware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chinese Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacker Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darfur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article in the Washington Post this morning about China-based hackers targeting a group of Darfur supporters called &#8220;Save Darfur Coalition&#8221;.  The article indicates that the Save Darfur Coalition is critical of the PRC role in Darfur.   The allegation fits a near decade-old pattern of cyber-espionage and cyber-intimidation by the Chinese government against critics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--noadsense--><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/map_of_darfur.png" title="Sudan"><img src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/map_of_darfur.png" alt="Sudan" /></a></p>
<p>An interesting <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/20/AR2008032003193.html" title="article">article</a> in the Washington Post this morning about China-based hackers targeting a group of Darfur supporters called &#8220;Save Darfur Coalition&#8221;.  The article indicates that the Save Darfur Coalition is critical of the PRC role in Darfur. </p>
<blockquote><p> <em>The allegation fits a near decade-old pattern of cyber-espionage and cyber-intimidation by the Chinese government against critics of its human rights practices, experts said. It comes as calls for a boycott of the 2008 Beijing Olympics have been mounting since China&#8217;s crackdown on Tibetan protesters last week. &#8220;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>This reminds me of the targeted attacks on members of Fa1un G0ng <a href="http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3835" title="reported">reported</a> by <a href="http://www.daemon.be/maarten/" title="Maarten Van Horenbeeck">Maarten Van Horenbeeck</a>.  Also see Maarten&#8217;s CCC presentation <a href="http://www.daemon.be/maarten/Crouching_Powerpoint_Hidden_Trojan_24C3.pdf" title="here">here</a>.  Heike <a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=359" title="reported">reported</a> on Maarten&#8217;s presentation earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2008/03/darfur-needs-help-not-malware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

