<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Dark Visitor &#187; China internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/category/china-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CDT:  ISP Level Gmail Phishing</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/08/cdt-isp-level-gmail-phishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/08/cdt-isp-level-gmail-phishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 02:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xinjiang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via @torproject comes a link to a China Digital TImes (a site run at Berkeley) that gives just a brief notice that some users behind the GFW are having their gmail login attempts redirected to hxxp://124.117.227.201/web/gmail/ where they are asked to enter their password. Chinese users reporting this redirect believe that the redirects are being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via @torproject comes a <a href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2010/08/china-isp-level-gmail-phishing/">link</a> to a China Digital TImes (a site run at Berkeley) that gives just a brief notice that some users behind the GFW are having their gmail login attempts redirected to hxxp://124.117.227.201/web/gmail/ where they are asked to enter their password.  Chinese users reporting this redirect believe that the redirects are being performed by the ISP.  Interestingly, 124.117.227.201 is a CNC host in Xinjiang.  </p>
<p>At the time of this post the hxxp://124.117.227.201/web/gmail/ site is not operating (from the US or the PRC according to webpulse).</p>
<p>The original info apparently came from ntdtv:<br />
<a href="https://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2010/08/11/a417907_p.html">中国ISP騙取gmail密码 被現場抓獲</a></p>
<div id="attachment_2168" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/p1154953a649068811.jpg"><img src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/p1154953a649068811-300x192.jpg" alt="https://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2010/08/11/a417907_p.html" title="Cap from https://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2010/08/11/a417907_p.html" width="300" height="192" class="size-medium wp-image-2168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">https://www.ntdtv.com/xtr/b5/2010/08/11/a417907_p.html</p></div>
<p>UPDATE:  I was looking closely at the screen cap that shows the source and it appears that part of the phishing app is hosted on ndns01.com, which doesn&#8217;t presently have an IP address assigned although the DNS record was updated on August 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/08/cdt-isp-level-gmail-phishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>F-U Tencent!</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/07/f-u-tencent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/07/f-u-tencent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tencent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate QQ too. Just thought I would post something that isn&#8217;t about #LIGATT&#8230; From one of my favorite sites, Danwei, comes an amusing post covering the China Computer World article cursing Tencent, one of the largest Internet companies in the PRC. Tencent is the primary developer of QQ, what may be the most widely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate QQ too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/JDM100726tencent.jpg"><img src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/JDM100726tencent-243x300.jpg" alt="" title="JDM100726tencent" width="243" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2164" /></a></p>
<p>Just thought I would post something that isn&#8217;t about #LIGATT&#8230;</p>
<p>From one of my favorite sites, <a href="http://www.danwei.org/">Danwei</a>, comes an <a href="http://www.danwei.org/internet/tencent_china_computerworld.php">amusing post</a> covering the China Computer World article cursing Tencent, one of the largest Internet companies in the PRC.  Tencent is the primary developer of QQ, what may be the most widely used IM client in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/07/f-u-tencent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC based members of carders.cc</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/05/prc-hacker-n-skyline-member-of-carders-cc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/05/prc-hacker-n-skyline-member-of-carders-cc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cyber Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BFD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carders.cc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skyline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jhaddix posted something that caught my attention on twitter earlier today. It mentioned that the well-known cc trading site carders.cc had been compromised and that all of the user accounts, password hashes and some IP access logs were exposed here. I thought it might be interesting to find out if there were any well-known PRC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jhaddix posted something that caught my attention on twitter earlier today.  It mentioned that the well-known cc trading site carders.cc had been compromised and that all of the user accounts, password hashes and some IP access logs were exposed <a href="http://pastebin.de/6648">here</a>.  I thought it might be interesting to find out if there were any well-known PRC connections so I quickly wrote a script to geolocate the IP addresses and found only one China-based IP (with a .ru email tld):</p>
<p>7742:N-Skyline:222.73.19.174:11.May,2010,17:44:34 (Beijing)<br />
N-Skyline:da1e1cdcc8d48037855f2ee2763b4064126fb5ea::n-skyline@qip.ru</p>
<p>There were some .cn email addresses too:<br />
FinnX:01203eb70433505a23d9dbddddaa303e56f6da46::php-dev@jublo.cn<br />
darkc0der:a5ecae753b068cf1f25b95665ad04f8f::cyberatack@w.cn<br />
Out:ec980574500aee917c8266655cbc547d::offshore@w.cn<br />
PWND # MESUT:7e1869df98aa93e3e5b5c473063499ca::PWNEDMESUT@w.cn<br />
0grish:abe3eda164cb318f91cb9aefb654b56790bc7613:lol109:ogrish@w.cn</p>
<p>This is also interesting:</p>
<p>12519:bifrostilo:202.67.236.74:12.May,2010,00:00:09 (HK)<br />
bifrostilo:4c6216cbe0ee90f22eee0bb3e7160999::renehuebner.de@gmx.de</p>
<p>BFD. </p>
<p>As an afterthought &#8211; before people start commenting, I thought I should mention that I&#8217;m aware that .cn and geoip do not necessarily mean that the person using that IP address or tld is/are physically located in the PRC.  Thanks for not commenting about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/05/prc-hacker-n-skyline-member-of-carders-cc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shanghai Jiaotong named as a source in Google compromise</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/02/shanghai-jiaotong-named-as-a-source-in-google-compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/02/shanghai-jiaotong-named-as-a-source-in-google-compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javaphile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peng Yinan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SJTU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loyal readers of TDV may remember Heike&#8217;s post about Peng Yinan, aka Coolswallow of Javaphile. According to this NY Times article, the school that Yinan has occasionally taught at was discovered to have been involved in the Google compromise revealed last month. At this point, it is only the IP addresses that seem to link [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pengyinannew1.jpg"><img src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/pengyinannew1-300x270.jpg" alt="" title="pengyinannew1" width="300" height="270" class="size-medium wp-image-2134" /></a>Loyal readers of TDV may remember Heike&#8217;s <a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2008/06/chinese-hacker-huntingwhere-is-coolswallowericoolpeng-yinan/">post about Peng Yinan</a>, aka Coolswallow of Javaphile.  According to this <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/19/technology/19china.html">NY Times article</a>, the school that Yinan has occasionally taught at was discovered to have been involved in the Google compromise revealed last month.  At this point, it is only the IP addresses that seem to link the school to the compromise but it is an interesting coincdence that one of the most prolific Chinese hackers has a close connection to the school.</p>
<p>There are many possibilities for SJTU&#8217;s IP addresses being involved in the incident.  Any assessments made about SJTU&#8217;s involvement at this point would be just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/02/shanghai-jiaotong-named-as-a-source-in-google-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC Gov Responses to Hacking Allegations &#8211; Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 03:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All dates represent the date the article was published, not necesarily the date that the quote was made. July 26, 2004 In response to accusations that the Chinese government was involved in computer intrusions against ROK government agencies &#8220;Some media reports that the Chinese government might be behind the hacking incident are groundless&#8221; &#8211; Chinese [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All dates represent the date the article was published, not necesarily the date that the quote was made.</p>
<p><strong>July 26, 2004</strong><br />
In response to accusations that the Chinese government was involved in computer intrusions against ROK government agencies<br />
<em>&#8220;Some media reports that the Chinese government might be behind the hacking incident are groundless&#8221;</em> &#8211; Chinese Embassy in Seoul (no personal attribution)</p>
<p><strong>December 15, 2005</strong><br />
Response to SANS comments about China being involved in world wide hacking<br />
<em>&#8220;Work units and individuals are not permitted to use the Internet to be engaged in illegal activities or commit crimes,&#8230; China has laws that make tampering with or cracking a computer&#8217;s code illegal.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Qin Gang<br />
<strong></p>
<p>August 27, 2007</strong><br />
In response to a Der Spiegel article that reported intrusions into the German governemnt<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government attaches great importance to the hacker attack on the German government networks,&#8221;</em> adding China would take <em>&#8220;determined&#8221;</em> and <em>&#8220;forceful&#8221;</em> measures to combat hacker activities.  &#8211; Wen Jiabao</p>
<p><strong>August 28, 2007</strong><br />
In response to the reports of Chinese attributed intrusions into the government of Germany<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government has always opposed and prohibited any criminal activity that breaks down computer networks, including hacker attacks,&#8230; China has clear rules and regulations on this.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>September 4, 2007</strong><br />
In a public response to the FT article that suggested PRC government involvement in a Pentagon intrusion<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese government has always opposed any Internet-wrecking crime, including hacking, and cracked down on it according to the law&#8221;</em> &#8211; An Lu (editor)</p>
<p><strong>September 10, 2007</strong><br />
Response to reports about intrusions into the French government for which the French plainly stated that they have no evidence to indicate PRC gov involvement.<br />
<em>&#8220;Saying that the Chinese military has made cyber-attacks on the networks of foreign governments is groundless and irresponsible and are a result of ulterior motives&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>April 9, 2008</strong><br />
In response to Business Week&#8217;s e-Spionage article<br />
<em>&#8220;The Chinese Government always opposes and forbids any cyber crimes including &#8220;hacking&#8221; that undermine the security of computer networks. Chinese laws and regulations are explicit in this regard.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Wang Baodong</p>
<p><strong>April 1, 2009</strong><br />
In response to Ghostnet report<br />
<em>&#8220;There is a ghost called the Cold War and a virus called the Theory of China&#8217;s Threat overseas,&#8230; Some people, possessed by this ghost and infected with this virus, &#8216;fall ill&#8217; from time to time. Their attempts at using rumors to disgrace China will never succeed&#8230;  It is the ghost and the virus that should be ferreted out&#8221; </em>- Qin Gang</p>
<p><strong>May 15, 2009</strong><br />
Response to accusations of Chinese espionage in PACOM.<br />
<em>&#8220;We urge the United States to abandon Cold War mentality, stop its groundless accusations against China and do more to help build mutual trust between the United States and China and the friendship between the two peoples,&#8221; &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu<br />
&#8220;The intrusion doesn&#8217;t exist at all&#8221;</em> &#8211; Jiang Yu</p>
<p><strong>Jun 12, 2008</strong><br />
In response to reports of Chinese hacking into computers in the offices of Rep. Frank Wolf and Rep. Chris Smith.<br />
<em>&#8220;Is there any evidence? &#8230; Do we have such advanced technology? Even I don&#8217;t believe it,&#8230; I&#8217;d like to urge some people in the U.S. not to be paranoid,&#8230; They should do more to contribute to mutual understanding, trust and friendship between the U.S. and China.&#8221;</em> &#8211; Qin Gang</p>
<p><strong>January 19, 2010</strong><br />
In response to Indian allegations of Chinese hacking (following the Google intrusion)<br />
&#8220;I can say that these accusations are groundless&#8230; The Chinese government is firmly against hacking activities and will deal with relevant cases in accordance with the law&#8221; &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu</p>
<p><strong>January 22, 2010</strong><br />
In response to US Sec of State Hillary Clinton&#8217;s remarks about Internet Freedom and the Google intrusion<br />
<em>&#8220;We urge the United States to respect the facts and cease using so-called Internet freedom to make groundless accusations against China&#8221;</em> &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu<br />
<em>&#8220;China resolutely opposes Clinton&#8217;s remarks and it is not true that the country restricts online freedom&#8230;&#8221;</em> &#8211; Ma Zhaoxu</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/26/world/asia/26google.html?partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss">January 25, 2010</a></strong><br />
In response to US Sec of State Clinton&#8217;s request for a transparent investigation into the Google intrusion<br />
<em>“We are resolutely against those who make a issue of things without referring to actual facts by needlessly accusing China, ignoring Chinese laws and interfering in Chinese internal politics&#8221;</em> &#8211; unnamed spokesperson for the State Council Information Office</p>
<p><em>“As the global landscape is undergoing profound irreversible shifts, the calculated free-Internet scheme is just one step of a U.S. tactic to preserve its hegemonic domination”</em> &#8211; Yan Xuetong </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100125/wl_asia_afp/chinausitinternetgoogle6thleadwrap">January 25, 2010</a></strong><br />
Response to Google intrusion<br />
<em>The &#8220;accusation that the Chinese government participated in (any) cyberattack, either in an explicit or inexplicit way, is groundless and aims to denigrate China&#8230; We are firmly opposed to that&#8221; &#8211; unnamed spokesman for the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to Xinhua </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-gov-responses-to-hacking-allegations-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom of Speech?  Not according to Baidu.</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/freedom-of-speech-not-according-to-baidu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/freedom-of-speech-not-according-to-baidu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baidu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the Chinese blogs I read had a post about this Baidu dictionary reference. Loosely translated: Freedom of Speech &#8211; basically not in China. It gives a link to a board where it may have picked up this definition. The author, greysign, laments that there are rampant lawless anti-party elements slandering China. Is it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the <a href="http://hi.baidu.com/greysign/blog/item/90c5ca16a065c813972b4394.html">Chinese blogs I read</a> had a post about this Baidu dictionary reference.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-1.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2113" title="Freedom of Speech - Basically not in China" src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-1-300x185.png" alt="" width="300" height="185" /></a></p>
<p>Loosely translated:  Freedom of Speech &#8211; basically not in China.  It gives a link to a <a href="http://www.ncxys.com/viewthread.php?tid=374391">board</a> where it may have picked up this definition.  The author, greysign, laments that there are rampant lawless anti-party elements slandering China.  Is it really slander to say that there isn&#8217;t freedom of speech in China?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/freedom-of-speech-not-according-to-baidu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers for company ripped off by green dam targeted in spear phishing attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/lawyers-for-company-ripped-off-by-green-dam-targeted-in-spear-phishing-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/lawyers-for-company-ripped-off-by-green-dam-targeted-in-spear-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danwei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Dam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is starting to get boring&#8230; Lawyers for Cybersitter, the company that claims its intellectual property was ripped off by PRC companies that developed the green dam youth escort in home censorware are now claiming that they have been targeted in spear phishing style attacks.  Maybe the PRC companies didn&#8217;t get all of the code [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is starting to get boring&#8230;</p>
<p>Lawyers for Cybersitter, the company that claims its intellectual property was ripped off by PRC companies that developed the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Dam_Youth_Escort">green dam youth escort</a> in home censorware are now claiming that they have been targeted in spear phishing style attacks.  Maybe the PRC companies didn&#8217;t get all of the code the first time.</p>
<p>Article <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60D0C120100114">here</a> &#8211; linked from <a href="http://www.danwei.org/side/">Danwei</a> (one of my favorite China sites).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/green-damn-girl-01.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2110" title="green-damn-girl-01" src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/green-damn-girl-01-253x300.jpg" alt="" width="253" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/lawyers-for-company-ripped-off-by-green-dam-targeted-in-spear-phishing-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese hackers don&#8217;t like Iranian Diabetics</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/chinese-hackers-dont-like-iranian-diabetics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/chinese-hackers-dont-like-iranian-diabetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an apparent outrage at the defacing of Baidu, the great national symbol of the PRC interwebz, Chinese hackers have defaced an Iranian site that distributes information about diabetes.  Take that Iranian nationalist hackers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an apparent outrage at the defacing of Baidu, the great national symbol of the PRC interwebz, Chinese hackers have defaced an Iranian site that distributes information about diabetes.  Take that Iranian nationalist hackers!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/20100113100146440.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2106" title="20100113100146440" src="http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/20100113100146440-300x240.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/chinese-hackers-dont-like-iranian-diabetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brav[e&#124;o] Google.cn</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/braveo-google-cn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/braveo-google-cn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GFW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what may be the most significant news posted to this blog in a long time, the Official Google Blog reports that Google will be working with the PRC government to deliver an unfiltered google.cn to users in the PRC.  If an agreement with the PRC government cannot be reached, google.cn may suspend operations.  From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what may be the most significant news posted to this blog in a long time, the Official Google Blog <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html">reports</a> that Google will be working with the PRC government to deliver an unfiltered google.cn to users in the PRC.  If an agreement with the PRC government cannot be reached, google.cn may suspend operations.  From the blog post:</p>
<blockquote><p>We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.</p></blockquote>
<p>This move is in response to an internal Google investigation that revealed widespread targeting and surveillance of human rights activists with interests in the PRC.  The blog indicates that there are two distinctly different problems that were uncovered.  One involved the compromise of internal Google intellectual property and the other involved the accessing of gmail accounts by unauthorized third parties.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties.</p></blockquote>
<p>Google believes that the sophisticated attacks that resulted in the internal compromise of Google information have also hit more than 20 other organizations.</p>
<p>So what does this mean?  It is difficult to say at this point.  Perhaps it will draw attention to the censorship issue as well as the widespread hacking frequently attributed to the PRC government.  I think it will be unlikely that google.cn will be allowed to operate in the PRC without filtering its search results.  This may mean that google.cn will cease to exist or that it is operated outside of the PRC where it will probably get GFW&#8217;d.  Either way, Baidu wins.</p>
<p>It would be very cool if others (yahoo!, microsoft) <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10433609-56.html">follow suit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/braveo-google-cn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRC hackers attack Iranian websites</title>
		<link>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-hackers-attack-iranian-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-hackers-attack-iranian-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jumper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[China internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China vs. Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/?p=2099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several Chinese security bloggers and the Rising AV company are reporting that Chinese hackers are going after Iranian websites.  Apparently in response to the Baidu DNS compromise. http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#38;tl=en&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32938.html http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#38;tl=en&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32926.html http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#38;tl=en&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32933.html http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&#38;tl=en&#38;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-13%2F32955.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several Chinese security bloggers and the Rising AV company are reporting that Chinese hackers are going after Iranian websites.  Apparently in response to the Baidu DNS compromise.</p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32938.html">http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32938.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32926.html">http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32926.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32933.html">http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-12%2F32933.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-13%2F32955.html">http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hackbase.com%2Fnews%2F2010-01-13%2F32955.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedarkvisitor.com/2010/01/prc-hackers-attack-iranian-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
